The Lobster – Love in a Dystopian Future


“The Lobster” is definitely an interesting movie and even if not perfect is a fresh breeze in the film world where love stories are dominated by sugar coated American productions. The feature takes place in a dystopian future, where everyone is forced to have a partner. If you lose one you have to move to the Hotel where you have 45 days to find your new mate. If you fail you’re turned into an animal of your choice. The main unnamed character, The Shortsighted Man (Colin Farrell) chooses to become a lobster if he fails, hence the title.

To say more about the plot would be to take away part of the pleasure from observing and understanding this alien world. Its customs and a rules are odd yet fascinating and one feels like an anthropologist studying a newly found trouble when watching the movie. Even though the setting is quite tragic, the film isn’t deprived of humor and there are quite a few moments when one can’t help but smile.

The acting is at the highest level. I was positively surprised by Colin Farrell whom I never considered to be a particularly gifted actor and who delivers a stunning performance. It’s also nice to see Rachel Weich who not only doesn’t age but also doesn’t get trapped in signature mannerism (a vice of many accomplished actors). Bond fans will be pleased to see his new girl from “Spectre”. She can be heard speaking French but not seen being drawn like one of the French girls (wink wink). Those who have an undying love for “Peep Show” also will be positively surprised by someone’s presence.

What is more, the movie is quite theatrical. The moment we start to truly relate to the characters, it is interrupted with a surreal scene often accompanied by music, which makes us realize that what we see isn’t meant to depict a reality but rather a fantasy. Due to this technique it keeps playing with the audience’s expectations.

The film is a curiosity, however, it gets slightly tedious. The novelty wears off somewhere half way down the movie and the second part which seems to be in contrast to the first seems lengthy. As we only see the part of the world that related to love and companionship the ideas are finite and it would be nice if the movie could undergo a director’s cut.

Having said all that it’s nice to see something different. The movie touches upon important issues such as what is love (baby don’t hurt me, don’t hurt me no more), is being in a relationship always better than being single and whether governments should be allowed to decide about private lives. It’s a good watch that I’d recommend to anyone who enjoys cinema that explores new horizons.

Now to you, Dear Rinser… Is having a partner always better than not having one? What’s love based on and are there any rules of who with one falls in love?



  1. If you have the right partner it is always better than being by yourself or not having one. Love is based on unselfishness and a loving bond that both feel toward each other. One rule to live be treat the one you love like you will never love again …cherish them.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I want to comment on your actual question but I’m still in shock that such a movie exists! What a crazy plot!
    I don’t think having a partner is always better than not having one. 1. It’s hard to use the word “always” here. 2. Possibly the right partner is better than no partner… but just any partner? Not necessarily better.
    What is love based on and are there any rules of who with one falls in love?
    I’ll be watching this post to see if someone has an answer. I sure as Hell do not know! Thanks for the always interesting topics.

    Liked by 1 person

    • It’s a really interesting movie! Just nice to see something else. I think there may be societies in which unfortunately having a partner is always better (when a partner is the only person that can protect you from unwanted attention) but in modern western world it does seem a little bit weird as an idea. Oh, and sorry for the disappointment – I don’t know the answer 😊

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I don’t think most people are inclined to be alone. We are sociable creatures and I think we are meant to find a partner and have a family, etc. However, humans are more complex than other animal species. We can’t just mate with anyone. So while we should NEVER resign ourselves to being a SAD SPINSTER, we should also not stress ourselves out trying to find a man/woman. It’s also important to enjoy single time and use it as an opportunity to figure yourself out.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.